What are common risks associated with FDI in the MENA region

What are common risks associated with FDI in the MENA region

Blog Article

Risk research reports have mainly focused on political dangers, usually overlooking the critical effect of cultural factors on investment sustainability.

Although political uncertainty generally seems to dominate media coverage on the Middle East, in recent years, the region—and particularly the Arabian Gulf—has seen a steady increase in international direct investment (FDI). The Middle East and Arab Gulf markets are becoming increasingly appealing for FDI. But, the present research on how multinational corporations perceive area specific dangers is scarce and usually lacks insights, a fact lawyers and danger specialists like Louise Flanagan in Ras Al Khaimah may likely be aware of. Studies on dangers related to FDI in the region have a tendency to overstate and mostly concentrate on political dangers, such as for example government instability or policy modifications that may impact investments. But recent research has begun to illuminate a crucial yet often overlooked aspect, particularly the consequences of cultural facets in the sustainability of foreign investments in the Arab Gulf. Indeed, a number of studies expose that many businesses and their management teams somewhat brush aside the impact of cultural differences, due primarily to a lack of knowledge of these cultural factors.

Working on adjusting to local traditions is important however sufficient for effective integration. Integration is a loosely defined concept involving many things, such as appreciating regional values, understanding decision-making styles beyond a limited transactional business viewpoint, and looking into societal norms that influence company practices. In GCC countries, successful business interactions are far more than just transactional interactions. What affects employee motivation and job satisfaction differ greatly across countries. Thus, to genuinely integrate your business in the Middle East a couple of things are expected. Firstly, a corporate mind-set shift in risk management beyond financial risk management tools, as professionals and solicitors such as Salem Al Kait and Ammar Haykal in Ras Al Khaimah would probably suggest. Secondly, strategies that may be effectively implemented on the ground to translate this new mindset into practice.

Recent studies on dangers connected to foreign direct investments in the MENA region offer fresh insights, attempting to bridge the research gap in empirical knowledge concerning the danger perceptions and management techniques of Western multinational corporations active widely in the region. As an example, a study involving several major international companies in the GCC countries revealed some fascinating data. It suggested that the risks associated with foreign investments are much more complex than simply political or exchange price risks. Cultural risks are regarded as more important than governmental, financial, or economic dangers in accordance with survey data . Furthermore, the study unearthed that while aspects of Arab culture strongly influence the business environment, many foreign companies find it difficult to adjust to regional traditions and routines. This difficulty in adapting is really a danger dimension that requires further investigation and a big change in how multinational corporations run in the area.